How big business is hampering Japan’s climate efforts | Climate change

Japan’s influential business federation is dominated by the electricity, steel, automotive and fossil fuel industries, according to a study.

Japan’s powerful business lobby, the Keidanren, is dominated by energy-intensive sectors that make up less than 10% of the economy, resulting in national policies that favor coal and hamper attempts to tackle climate change, according to a new study.

The influence of the electricity, steel, cement, automotive and fossil fuel sectors is undermining Japan’s attempts to meet its commitments in the Paris Agreement, according to the company’s report. London-based data analysis InfluenceMap.

The Keidanren, also known as the Japan Business Federation and which has close ties with the Ministry of Trade and Industry, as well as other government agencies, sits on expert groups and other forums where government policies are debated. He has acted as a “central negotiating point” on climate policy for two decades, according to the report.

Although she claims to represent all Japanese companies, that claim “should clearly be challenged on climate / energy policy,” said InfluenceMap. He added that Keidanren’s most powerful industries employ only around 2.7 million people, while those with little influence employ 10 times as many.

Lobbying and consultation with business groups will be essential next year when the government revises its strategic energy plan.

Keidanren’s influence was seen last year when he argued that a proposed government target of reducing emissions by 80% by 2050 was “extremely ambitious” and prompted any new target to be a “vision,” InfluenceMap said.

Japan then adopted the goal of achieving carbon neutrality as soon as possible in the second half of this century, rather than an explicit emissions target for 2050.

The Keidanren said in a statement to Reuters he could not comment on the study because he had not yet officially received a copy. But he added that he had made political commitments to building a low-carbon society and that the government’s climate targets were in line with the Paris Agreement targets.

The United Nations-backed Paris Agreement entered into force on November 4, 2016 and aims to maintain “an increase in global temperature this century well below two degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) above levels pre-industrial and to continue efforts to limit the temperature. increase even more to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees F).

Increased use of coal

InfluenceMap noted that other groups in Japan that have prominent companies in the retail, finance, tech and construction sectors as members – such as the Japan Climate Initiative and the Japan Climate Leaders’ Partnership – have strongly criticized the government’s efforts on climate change.

The results of the study are “mostly consistent with my personal experience as a decision maker in Japan to negotiate the Kyoto Protocol and develop national legislation,” Hikaru Kobayashi, deputy environment minister of Japan, told Reuters. July 2009 to January 2011.

“What surprises me is that this remains the same today.”

Japan’s coal consumption reached record highs in the years following the Fukushima nuclear disaster in 2011 which shut down most of the country’s reactors.

Japan is also the only G7 country to work on a major deployment of coal-fired power, with companies planning to build around 20 new coal-fired power plants with a total capacity of around 12,000 megawatts, by a decade, according to a Reuters survey last year.

Coal now produces 32% of Japan’s electricity, although the government wants that to drop to 26% and renewables to rise to 22-24%. by 2030 about 18 percent currently.

Using government statistics, InfluenceMap ranked industries by economic importance, then assessed the influence of industry associations both within the Keidanren and outside the federation.

He chose 50 groups for the study, ranking them using two measures: the degree of support a group has for climate policies that meet the Paris targets, and the intensity with which a group is engage with government on climate policy.


Source link

About the author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *